Saturday, 17 July 2021

Video led Discussion on Leadership









 I have been covering in my blog the webinars organized by Bija training under their Mask leadership series that provide insights to the viewers for becoming  better leaders. Dr Anuj Kacker, President and ED Aptech Ltd,  the speaker on 23rd June 2021 chose to include many videos during the discussion to drive home his points . At the outset, the speaker was keen to dispel any myths that we may have about leadership. As for example we tend to believe that all leaders should have the ability to speak (Showed videos of Hitler and Lalu Prasad Yadav speaking in effective yet totally different styles) or have a dynamic/charismatic personality (showed a video of M.K.Gandhi).  Dr Anuj  stated that he neither had the speaking prowess of great speakers or a magnetic personality like that of Gandhi and yet he was a leader. It is necessary to keep aside these attributes and see in what ways may a leader contribute. 

Generally, a leader is expected to inspire and motivate, show an intention to influence people while giving them some direction and exercising some control. He/She is endowed with some authority and also has  the responsibility for the end result. Looked at this way, we are all leaders in different situations and times. We tend to assume the responsibilities and requirements when in the role. According to the speaker, practical experience gained from situations is what enables one to develop leadership skills rather than mere theoretical inputs. The onus is on the person in a leadership position to constantly improve, during the journey. Dr Anuj said that leadership qualities "cannot be emulated.Each person has to develop his/her own style."  

To underscore the importance of people working in harmony in a company, the speaker showed a video of the maestro Mozart guiding his symphony orchestra with motion of hands and body. It is a wonderful metaphor for an organization. If people play well their own tunes in disharmony, it will not serve the interests of the organization. Dr Anuj then went on to show videos of conductors performing using varying styles to draw attention to the point that leaders may use different - own unique style, suitable for themselves and team, so long as they are successful and get the desired results.  

The videos shared during the evening included that of Grammy award winner, Riccardo Muti,  whose style and body movements suggested that he expected strict compliance to instructions. There is no scope for any change under his leadership. We then saw the video of a conductor who employed a slow, calm, composed body language. He let his team perform organically. Here, the leader seems to say "The music is already written; the job is known, they just have to be left alone to to do what they know best without interference". Another video featuring an Austrian conductor showed him with eyes closed, giving space to his musicians to perform without clear instructions. 

We then had a video featuring conductor Johann Strauss who used a smooth dancing style, creating a happy place with everyone feeling a partner in the process. In the final video of the evening, the conductor Goldstein (could not get his first name), appeared to have  reached a stage where he trusted  his team's ability to deliver  without  interference. There was minimal facial expression or hand movement. 

Dr Anuj summed up the talk reiterating what he said all through the evening namely development of a leadership style unique to yourself and the situation you are operating in and also catering to the changing needs and demands of the customer. While conducting his orchestra, the conductor Leonard Bernstein used to  encourage audience involvement and inputs. He is known as the "Benchmark for outreach and engagement".  Similarly in corporates, engagement with your team and the employees of the organization has become a basic requirement. A start up would need to come up with new rules and styles of working ,for engaging bright new employees and adapting to a changing environment. 

During question time, I asked as to how we could address the problem of most companies in India having the "wrong people in leadership positions" resembling the conductor Riccardo Muti who does not allow any autonomy and demands strict compliance to his instructions? In line with the stand he had been taking all the while, Dr Anuj said that he did not believe that a 'particular style of leadership' was either  'good' or 'bad' and that what matters was the end results achieved. However,  the speaker himself stated while discussing Muti, that as many as 700 musicians had at one time, resigned en masse from his team, unhappy with his working style.

To my mind, working with the millennials who will shortly comprise of the majority of the work force , is a different ball game altogether. What worked with earlier generation of employees are not likely to work with them. Harmony like in an orchestra, may be better established with millennials when we give them more freedom, autonomy and repose trust in their abilities. Further, it is high time that companies became transparent enough to declare their 'real' expectations instead of couching it in 'nice to hear language' such as " We believe in work life balance" when they expect people to put in 12 hours a day or " Teamwork is the most cherished value in our company" when they actually look up to individual contributions and reward people on that criteria. The least they can do is to be transparent like Amazon whose employees know they have a tough grind and still take it up because they love that kind of challenge.  

I would like to conclude this post showcasing  the main point that the speaker of the day Dr Anuj  drew attention to in a unique, engaging and entertaining manner whole through the evening-  There is not one leadership style. Do not look to copy or emulate some one else's style; nurture and develop your own  style  through observation, self analysis and practice!     

18 comments:

  1. Awesome.. That you have captured the points and narrated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much. Happy you related to and liked the post!

      Delete
  2. Nicely captured and expressed. Thanks for the same

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank a lot Mr Deivarayan! happy you liked the post.

      Delete
  3. Hari OM
    Most interesting... (I think it may be Carlo Goldstein). I take your own view, that there must be adaptation for the generations and that authoritarian (totalitarian?) methodologies were never really appropriate no matter how effective! I am also alawys intrigued how sometimes themes appear in neighbouring blogs - I had posted on leadership from philosophical perspective only recently! A subject most relevant these days... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts! So happy to receive them. I will go through your post on leadership and respond.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting perspectives on leadership. Most of the examples cited are related to music. If examples of leaders in Indian corporates are provided it will be easy to relate. I have come across Muti like leaders in the Indian corporate arena, where the attrition rate is high but the board turns a blind eye because the leader is hands on and is able to deliver results much higher than expected. The Board is happy. This gives a purely short term benefit. In the long term when the leader departs, there will no second line and bridging the vacuum is not at all easy. It will reflect on the capabilities of the leader taking over the mantle. A tough job to create a team all over again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks a lot for sharing your experience and insights Sundar!

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is no work life balance these days. Only work, work and work. Transparency is rare to find. Decentralization of powers is not happening. Leadership is not of skills, but of influence, sorry to say. The tall claims of management in highly softened words can't be taken for face value. These are mostly applicable to private organizations. My views.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you so much Pankajam for sharing your thoughts on the subject!

    ReplyDelete
  9. The essential qualities and attitude that are required for a leader are well depicted with proper examples. I agree with Sundar's views. An interesting read.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Articulated the views in cognitive and comprehensive way with suitable live examples and I concur with his conclusion that end result matters the most and success stories lead the rest. Spectacular article on Leadership. 👌👌👌👌👌

    ReplyDelete
  11. Intresting way of describing different styles of leadership.
    Style and effectiveness of leadership matters not only in corporate but in family also to achieve better results in harmonious atmosphere.

    You very aptly covered the webinar as reading your blog gave the feeling of attending the webinar live.
    Thanks for sharing it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks a lot for your feedback!So happy you found it relatable and useful.

    ReplyDelete